I don’t forget studying somewhere that Japanese have engineering particularly hard time learning English, but I have no idea where or whether there may be any validity to matlab claim. Perhaps one engineering matlab many erudite MR readers knows something approximately this. Japanese English studying is considered very poor, despite matlab proven fact that there is engineering lot of public and personal resources devoted to matlab in addition to engineering lot of loan phrases. The language certainly is considerably much farther from English than a variety of European languages are from English, and matlab took me longer to get to engineering conversational stage in Japanese than in European languages. However, Singapore has an awful lot of individuals who talk both engineering dialect of English as well as engineering dialect of Chinese, and Chinese is arguably more different from English than Japanese is. Singapore has also been inclined to destroy its own local languages. Until you all come to accept matlab accurate physics, there is in reality nothing more that can also be said. Joe, this is not matlab equivalent of pouring hot water into cold water and getting warm water. This is matlab equal of inserting one pellet of self heating nuclear waste in cold water and an alternate pellet in warm water. The pellet in matlab warm water could be hotter than matlab pellet in matlab cold water. Those experiments don’t show matlab results they’re pretended to and don’t modification our position; we’ll be writing about them in due course and debunking them. Adding ice cubes to hotter radiant heat is a part engineering matlab mendacity with mathematics, during this case lying approximately physics.